Double Commenting Annotations
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 9:50 am
Hi,
Long theoretical definition in a paper. Normally will highlight the whole thing.
In later reviewing the chapter(s), I find that there may be a simple three-word sequence within these longer highlights that is really the beating heart of the definition, the hook on which to hang the rest of the definition - the call back.
If I was reading the book itself I might find myself highlighting the longer definition first, and the underlining these key phrases.
Is there any way I could approximate this with PDF X-Change Editor? Could I go INTO the highlight and then ADD an underline?
Or, any other way?
(Right now my Highlights also copy the text.)
Many thanks,
SW
Long theoretical definition in a paper. Normally will highlight the whole thing.
In later reviewing the chapter(s), I find that there may be a simple three-word sequence within these longer highlights that is really the beating heart of the definition, the hook on which to hang the rest of the definition - the call back.
If I was reading the book itself I might find myself highlighting the longer definition first, and the underlining these key phrases.
Is there any way I could approximate this with PDF X-Change Editor? Could I go INTO the highlight and then ADD an underline?
Or, any other way?
(Right now my Highlights also copy the text.)
Many thanks,
SW