Willy Van Nuffel wrote:At my opinion the text in the help needs revision.
When you "Enter words or phrase..." in the first textbox (of the Search panel), these words must 'all' be part of the text that want to search and must be in the right order (sequence). I do not have the intention that AND or OR are allowed.
In either case it does not seem to work.
When you choose "Advanced Criterion", you can enter text in the boxes below 'Find text with'.
There you can choose to use one or more possibilities (depending of search in one or more documents):
- first textbox "all these words"
- second textbox "any of these words"
- third text "none of these words"
You also have the possibility to only search 'In active document', or 'In all opened documents'.
So, in your exemple, (looking for 'hot' or 'cold') you will have to use the "Advanced Criterion", enter the words 'hot cold' in the second textbox, and (below 'WHERE would you like to search ?) the option "In active document".
Yes, the same thing can be achieved with Advanced Search. But that's not the point. Advanced search requires too many steps and takes up too much space for me and according to the manual boolean operators should work in the standard search field. Just like they did in PDF-XChange Viewer. Just because there's a workaround or alternative way of achieving things doesn't mean this isn't a bug.
Will - Tracker Supp wrote:Hi guys,
Using the advanced search, as Willy mentioned, is working fine for me, but I believe that I initially misunderstood the problem - to use the advanced search to achieve this, you would have to remove the word " OR " and search for "hot cold" in the "Any of these words" field, as Willy suggested. The reason for this, is because adding the ability to use the booleans AND and OR could potentially cause a logical problem for the Editor, as there may be instances of OR/AND within the text of the document, and the Editor wouldn't know whether to actually search for those, or omit them and use the terms, when input into the search field, as search parameters.
Cheers,
My post was only about the standard search field. I wouldn't expect boolean operators to work in the Advanced search, since it already has dedicated fields for each boolean operator. Just like with Google's advanced search, you don't use operators when using dedicated search fields.